Dqciq: 4Op60
Yx
mvmmt sgbeg mss Qmmv
tfGEtf GBGEBB G» HBEQBr HEEVEECIG)
GECOTBEGG
JAN- MAR 1981
vc ^
SIGINT IN THE 80s: TWO VIEWS (U)
I . Robert E . Rich +//. . 1
II. William Lutwi ni ak f . : . . . 4
KITTIWAKE (U) J TT- . . . . 7
HOW TO IMPROVE YOUR PROMOTION POTENTIAL J*» J I ; . ..... .,'10
NSA-CROSTIC No. 32 , .D. H. W.... ... ..12
TRANSLATOR IN YOUR POCKET (U) J 1 . ...14
SOME THINGS NEVER CHANGE (U) ....17
NCS-CLA SYMPOSIUM (U) 18
WHY DO THEY LEAVE? (U) J I 19
P.L. 86-36
^classified and Approved for Relea
012 pursuant to E.O. 1352b ,
DOCID: 4019687
TOP 3ECRET
Published by PI, Techniques and Standards,
for the Personnel of Operations
VOL. VIII, No. 1 - 3
JANUARY - MARCH 1981
PUBLISHER
Editor-in-Chief
Collection
Cryptanalysis
Cryptolinguistics. .
Information Science
Language
Machine Support....
Mathematics
Special Research. . .
Traffic Analysis...
BOARD OF EDITORS
David H. Williams (1103s)
| ~| (8555s)
| (49Q2s)
(5981s)
(3034s)
\ ;8161s)
| | (5084s)
I t (8518s)
Vera R. Filby (7119s)
Don Taurone (3573s)
For individual subscriptions
send
name and organizational designator
to: CRYPTOLOG, PI
TOP S ECRET
DOCID: 4019687
SECRET SPOKE
SIGINT in
the 80 s:
Two Views
At the First Annual Symposium of the
Communications Analysis Association
held last year, the keynote address
was given by Mr. Robert E. Rich,
ADDO, and the concluding remarks
were presented by Mr. William Lut-
winiak, then Chief, PI, Techniques
and Standards. So that persons who
did not attend the symposium may see
the views of two eminent agency mana-
gers on the future of SIGINT in the
coming decade, CRYPTOLOG is pleased
to publish both of these addresses.
I. Robert E. Rich, ADDO
I appreciate the invitation from your president to talk with you this morning as you
begin your first conference, although I suspect that the term "Keynote Address" is
more akin to what Jimmy Carter and Ronald Reagan have been doing than to what we’re
up to here. After all, a keynote address is usually a long collection of rhetoric
that doesn’t have much to do with the real issues at hand. It’s just an upbeat thing
to get people in the mood to do the hard work. Forgive me if the rhetori c isn’t up to
the standard you’ve been hearing from the politicians. In any case, when | |
asked me to help kick off this series of meetings, it occurred to me that I wasn’t really
very sure what the expression I'communications analysis" was intended to mean. Having done
a little research — although not much analysis— I think I’ve discovered that it includes a
a fairly broad scale of the hardcore skills and activities that are most critical to our
business. It embraces cryptanalysis, traf-
fic analysis, language work, and what we
usually call "special research analysis,"
that is, the substantive interpretation of
data that normally has been put into read-
able English. So that covers a wide range:
of the specialities without which there
wouldn’t be any SIGINT product.
(U) For the remainder of this morn-
ing and during tomorrow's sessions,
you’ll be considering some of the
important things that will be happening
in the analytic environments of the next
ten years. Mainly these will have to do
with better ways of doing analytic work
with new tools, or at least new appli-
cations of technology. And a lot of
that will have to do with the incredible
potential offered by computers, especially
the use of computers in an interactive
way — machine working with human analyst
to solve problems or get results faster.
(U) You’ll be hearing, I think exclu-
sively, from members of our own community
describing their own work and their own
ideas, rather than from outside experts.
I mention that because I think we’re too
inclined to look to the outside in too
many hard areas when we ought to be stimu-
lating our own people to come forward
with the results of their inspirations
and their expectations for the future.
(U) To help you get started, I think the
most useful thing I can do is to share
some overall perceptions with you about
our state of health at the moment, and
to suggest some perspective about the
analytic function as it relates to the
other parts of the SIGINT process, and
then finally to mention some trends for
the future that will affect our prospects
in analysis. All, of course, from my own
vantage point, since there isn't much abso-
lute truth associated with these matters,
especially those which lie in the future.
(30 j~ First off, I will suggest to you that
SIGINT now is in better shape than at any
other time in our history. By that I mean
that the product we’re able to deliver is
more useful to more customers than ever
before. And that includes customers of
all kinds and at all sorts of levels: the
traditional ones in Washington (like the
White House and State and DoD and CIA) ,
and a wide range of military commanders
in the field, and also some newer custom-
ers, such as Treasury and Energy and Com-
merce. Day after day, the SIGINT output
P
L. 86-36
]
Jan-Mar 81 * CRYPTOLOG * Page 1
SECRET SPOKE
DOCID: 4019687
TOP S ECRET UMBRA
is useful to those people-t
(U) Now all that may sound like preaching
to the choir. But it sometimes turns out
that our people get so much engrossed in
a particular speciality that they don't
really appreciate the overall perspective
of how well we're doing at the moment. And
I hasten to add that I don't want to over-
state this, because there are certainly im-
provements we need to make and keep making
— the customers' appetite will always out-
strip our ability to deliver. And the
present state of affairs is also fragile;
it could be dramatically changed by a number
of things.
(TG CCO) But the point I want to make here
is that the reasons for this relatively
healthy state of affairs are not acciden-
tal — certainly not the result of the tar-
gets getting easier. (just the opposite
is, of course, the case.) The reasons are
complex, and I would just mention two of
-( G) The second thing that explains our cur-
rent success is the quality of our energetic
work force. The fact that we've got one
that compares pretty well with other pro- j
fessional populations is partly luck and
partly management. Luck because the nature
of the business attracts people of quality;
it's both demanding and rewarding from an ;
intellectual standpoint. And when we've
had to, we've been aggressive about finding
and hiring good people. Some years ago we p 0 1-4. (c)
badly needed a core of first-rate mathema- P-L- 86-36
ticians and we captured a good number who
are still here. More recently we've need- i
ed numbers of linguists, and by and large, j
they have been found — not yet enough, but
more about that later. But the point is,
that, in addition to pretty good collection i
access, we've had the advantage of an ana- i
lytic core of people who have an insatiable
curiosity and drive to solve the problem
and a high order of intellectual disci-
pline. Taken together, these are the main
ingredients in our present state of health. !
(U) But there's no reason for complacency
about any of that. The collection picture
is constantly changing and the work force
is always in a state of flux (even if we
have one of the lowest attrition rates in
the federal government) . So we need to be
constantly working to maintain a favorable
balance. Heavier demands are certainly
going to be put on it in the future. Which
brings me to the next point — namely, the
trends and influences that are going to
affect analytic work in the years ahead.
(U) The quality of crystal balls prob-
ably hasn't changed much over the years,
and mine isn't any better than most. But
I'd like to suggest several things about
our target environment that seem to me
likely to come about, and then describe
some/qualifications that those things
indicate for our analytic people.
-W5- In the decade ahead I would think it
almost certain that the Soviet Union will
continue to occupy the predominant part
of our energy. And for reasons you all
understand. It's just hard to imagine an
extensive enough change in the fundamental
difference between the USSR and the United
States during that period which might permit
us to do anything very different.
Jan-Mar 81 * CRYPTOLOG * Page 2
TOP SECRET UMBRA
DOCID:
4019687
SECRET SPOKE
,/E.O 1.4. (c)
/ ■ P IXi . 8 6-36
(G CCO j So these are factors that will in-
fluence the analytic enivronment of the fu-
ture, one way or the other. There* s another
class of influences, too, that will be import-
ant but hard to predict. An obvious one is
the resource constraints we f ll face. I
think we haven’t fared too badly in per-
centage of Federal budget allocated for SIG-
INT in recent years. We could do even better
in the future, but maybe not — it's hard to
know. Same thing with respect to technology.
The improvement in computer power in the
past decade has been almost incredible. If
other, similar breakthroughs occur in the
next decade, we could have great new opportu-
nities for better analytic work. But again,
it's hard to be sure.
(0 CGO) One thing, however, does seem cer-
tain. And that is that, regardless of im-
provements in machine capability, good anal-
ysis will still depend on good analysts.
And what is a good analyst? Some of the
characteristics won't change — they'll
be the same at the end of the coming decade
as they've always been. I already men-
tioned a couple of these: great curiosity
in approaching unsolved problems, coupled
with good intellectual discipline so as
to avoid sloppy inference and unwarranted
conclusions. There are some others which
will be more important in the future.
♦multi-discipline skills— a linguist
is a lot better off with an understanding
of the cryptanalytic work underlying the
decrypted text; an SRA is better equipped
EO 1.4. (c)
P.L. 86-36
Jan-Mar 81 * CRYPTOLOG * Page 3
SECRET SPOKE
DOCID: 4019687“
TOP S ECRET
with some understanding of the target lan-
guage. This has been true for a long
time, will be even more relevant in the
future as the need for flexibility grows.
♦the ability to deal comfortably with
machine-assisted techniques, to use compu-
ters to produce necessary data bases.
♦direct familiarity, where possible,
with target environment — by living there,
or at least by travelling in the area. Of
course, this isn't possible for some, but
could be for others.
♦for some analysts, a more comprehen-
sive grasp of special technology and termi-
nology (nuclear proliferation, advanced
weapons sytems, and the like).
♦flexibility in changing from one tar-
get area to another. We'll need to develop
more of this attribute, while still keeping
enough analysts with long-term continuity
on certain targets.
♦responsiveness and objectivity in under-
standing customer needs.
♦appreciation for the growing complexity
of collection arrangements, so that analysis
will be able to drive collection with maxi-
mum efficiency.
(OCCO )- The list can certainly be extended.
You will be thinking about some other impor-
tant aspects of it during the course of
this conference. For the moment, I'd like
to leave you with the thought I mentioned a
minute ago, namely, that regardless of how
well we come along with technological pro-
gress, such as increased computer power,
and regardless of how we solve the collection
problem, our success will still depend very
heavily on the quality of our analytic work
force. It's critically important that we
keep on acquiring young people who are ex-
cited by cryptanalysis, people who can
deal with traffic analytic problems, peo-
ple who have exceptional linguistic talent
—and preferably some who can do several
of these things well. Only in that way
can we hope to maintain anything like the
healthy posture we enjoy at the moment.
(U) I hope your sessions at this con-
ference are productive and stimulating
to you all, and I appreciate your atten-
tion this morning. Thank you.
II. William Lutwiniak, Chief, PI
W hen Bill Nolte asked me to ring down the curtain on this conference, my first reaction
was to demur; but he suggested I look at the topics and read the abstracts already in
hand before I begged off. I did that, and decided I could add some perspective to
(U) where we are now and what the 80s bode for communications analysis. I thought it
might be useful for experts in PI to give me their notions of what's in the offing for
the various cryptanalytic disciplines. I also pondered over Bob Rich's opening address.
When I put all this together I found I had some things to say that may be worth listen-
ing to.
— fTO CGQ) -We usually start with collection,
the sine qua non . The technology affecting
communication around the world is dynamic,
driven as it is by the need for more effi-
cient transmission. Satellite communica-
tions have been with us for some time, and
we cope with them daily, more or less suc-
cessfully, more and more selectively. But
satellites will be going digital, and do-
mestic satellites are in the wings— boding
point-to-point traffic in bursts of hun-
dreds of millions of bits per second.
Multi-channel communications can look
forward to electronic packet switching-
tiny pieces of a transmission are switched
electronically from channel to channel, un-
predictably unless you know the algorithms.
At the same time the spriralling costs of
satellite communications have driven tech-
nology to look again at the HF spectrum
(already saturated) with a view to over-
coming multipath, jamming and other inter-
ference and of getting around the restric-
tions of the Maximum Utilizable Frequency.
Mixed up in this is something called the
WARC (World Administrative Radio Confer-
ence) in which everybody argues about who
owns which parts of the radio spectrum and
under what conditions. A dominant theme
of WARC 79 was the need of the Third World
for HF allocations, to be provided by the
advanced nations, who are kind of balky
at the prospect. Advances in frequency
hopping, spread spectrum signals, com-
pression coding and other techniques make
the HF spectrum much more usable than
Jan-Mar 81 * CRYPTOLOG * Page 4
TOP SECRE T- 11 AMPLE VIA OOMIHT CHANNEL e- OHLY
docid:
TOP SECRET
before, and considerably cheaper than sat-
ellite communications. Needless to say.
(3-CCO) The volumes in view on these
0) So, one view of the 80s is that we
(G) - Technology is the threat, and techno-
logy has to be the answer for us. We’ve got
more and more computing power and it's get-
ting cheaper every year. A good thing, too,
since we have fewer people and more targets,
and that won’t change, except to increase.
The computer is the key, but we have to tame
it so that it serves the analyst rather than
the other way around. This problem has been
with us for some time; we’ve been changing
our technical lifestyle to live with the com-
puter. A smart fellow in PI points out that
some time ago we stopped talking about anal-
ysis and began to speak of processing. Think
about the implications of that one for a min-
ute. We took the traffic away from the traf-
fic analyst and put it in a computer, and he
couldn’t get it out without going through
middlemen. The only way to tap the tre-
mendous computer power to come — miniaturi-
zation, smarter and smarter terminals, per-
sonal portable computers— is to make that
power submissive to us analysts, rather than
for us to be dominated by it.
- (C -h We’ve networked our computers, cre-
ating some painful security headaches, but
we have created possibilities for a new
analytic reach across problems and great
opportunities for doing things we haven't
even thought of y et against targets we don’t ; L
vet Know about. / t 1
J Need it be said
/.so 1.
that, in a world where computers become
more and more dominant, analysts who under-
stand how a computer does its thing (and
I'm not talking about programmers, as such)
will find much to do all across the SIGINT
process.
■ (C CC0) ~ We haven’t really come to grips
standpoint. If there is any one thing about^
the entire SIGINT prbcess that makes it so
hard to explain to outsiders, it is the
wnttL mis conrerence is all about, isn't it?
(C-CCO) I have listened to an analyst de-
scribe to me how one analyst T ~
Jan-Mar 81 * CRYPTOLOG * Page 5
TOP S ECRET handle via oomint channels only
86-36
4. (c)
j
DOCID: 4019687
SECRET
and also take care of the technical feedback
in the process. Is he a misty-eyed dreamer?
But think of the skills, training and experi-
ence that one person would have to possess.
That person is the analyst of the late 80s.
How do we bring about the species? Just as
nature does — by evolution.
— (C CCO) - That is not to say that the classi-
cal SIGINT disciplines won't continue. We'll
still need cryptanalysts, traffic ana-
lysts, collection professionals, com-
puter scientists, linguists, signals
analysts, and all the others. But even
these specialists will need to be ver-
satile, comfortable in more than one
discipline, comfortable with computers
and microprocessors. We need to get
much better at handling plain language
— automatic translation remains an elu-
sive goal, but much can be done in mach-
ine-assisted translation of the recorded
word to improve the productivity of lin-
guists. The spoken word remains rela-
tively intractable, but I see real pro-
gress in the 80s in automatically se-
lecting the probable best traffic to
subject to the personal attention of the
transcriber. The traffic analyst can al-
ready, if he is willingto learn how to
get back his traffic and work his will
with it. The cryptanalyst has long since
harnessed the power of computers, but
even he needs to fit microprocessors and
personal computers into his lifestyle.
For any analyst, there is an area of
research which commences after pencil
and paper doodling and stops short of
getting to a terminal to order a com-
puter to do something, that is a sort of
wasteland of abandoned ideas and aborted
projects. The personal computer has an
important role to play here.
— (G) Bob Rich pointed out that our most
important resource is the quality of
out analytic workforce. The technology
that is and will be available in the 80s
means little unless we use it effectively
and imaginatively, and it is up to this
workforce to do just that. It isn't as
if we have any choice — all of us analysts
must become more versatile and more ef- ,
fective. We've got to improve our quali-
ty, because our quantity won't increase.
We must learn to use new tools, and in-
deed play an active role in choosing and
specifying those new tools. We must
find means to exchange information and
document new analytic techniques. This
has always been a problem in the past, but
now we are evolving into a world of com-
puter networks, terminal sub-systems
featuring mini-computers and microcom-
puters which will make up the analyst's
"SIGINT Target Station." The old
vehicles — C-Liners * Dragon Seeds ,
Sainte — could be revived, but will
they do? We're no longer talking about
pencil -and-paper techniques, easy to
describe and publish; we're talking
about how to choose from and apply a
set of several programs and many modules
which sort, select, reformat some sub-
set of an analyst's own data base. The
techniques may involve specialized pro-
gram language to retrieve and compare
two fields of different records based
on the contents of a third field, flag-
ging the records with shorthand code
for further treatment. How do we record,
publish and disseminate these? How do
we give each other the benefits of our
own improvements?
(C>- The crystal ball is murky; all one
can say for certain about the 80s for
the communications analyst is that they
will bring challenges. Only the dim
shape of those challenges can be dis-
cerned, but it is clear that we ana-
lysts will have to evolve into a SIGINT
world far more automated and computer-
ized than the one we have today. The
main challenge is to make automation and
computers work for us analysts, rather
than vice versa. And there is a chal-
lenge here for management: it must
foster the environment and climate to
permit the evolution of a new species.
**************
(UNCLASSIFIED)
SOLUTION TO NSA-CROSTIC No. 31.
From "Q. E. D. - 2 Hours, 41 Minutes,"
by Lambros D. Callimahos. NSA Tech-
nical Journal, Fall 1973.
"Spencer Akins: Letter to Birkhan."
"Your letter indicates that the purpose
of your entering into comnunication with
this office on the subject of the Kryha
cipher machine is to make known its
merits for consideration for use in the
military service. This device has al-
ready been well studied and, I regret
to advise, was found unsuitable for
adoption in the military service."
(UNCLASSIFIED)
**************/
Jan-Mar 81 * CRYPTO LOG * Page 6
S ECRET
HANDLE VIA OOMINT 01IANNDL3 ONLY
S ECRE T
he kittiwake is a small, far-ranging
gull (genus Ri8aa) s native to the
sheer cliff shorelines of Britain,
“■? and named in imitation of its cry.
Its rang e, at least in name, will soon be
extended \
P.L. 86-36
EO 1 . 4 . (c)
EO 1.4. (d)
Jan-Mar 81 * CRYPTOLOG * Page 7
S ECRET
1IAMDLE VIA COMINT OIIANNELO ONLY
DOCID: 4019687
P.L. 86-36
EO 1.4. (c)
EO 1.4. (d)
Jan-Mar 81 * CRYPTOLOG * Page 8
EO 1.4. (d)
Jan-Mar 81 * CRYPTOLOG * Page 9
S ECRET HANDLE VIA
DOCTtr: 4019687
UNCLASSIFIED
HOW TO IMPROVE YOUR
PROMOTION POTENTIAL
aMBIhe new Performance Planning, Evaluation
Tilrand Counselling program (PPEC) , put into
effect in January 1981, should make it
easier for you to see what is in your records
and to know what your supervisor expects of
you. However, as with past systems, A LOT
WILL STILL BE UP TO YOU. While the follow-
ing suggestions won't guarantee you a pro-
motion, they can help you stay ahead of
whoever is in second place. (That statement
and the following are my personal suggestions.)
First, you must know what your job is, and
do it well; keep your boss happy; support your
organization; and, be a conscientious, depend-
able employee. Competition is keen, so you
must go that extra step, be a bit more cre-
ative, work a little harder, and produce a
little more to stay ahead of your peers.
Second, make sure; your personnel records
are accurate and current. These records re-
present you during many important reviews, as,
for instance, when management is considering
candidates for key positions or special as-
signments. Also, promotion boards select
or reject people for promotion largely on
the basis of the data contained in their
records. Pay particular attention to
assuring that the following are correctly
represented:
^ Performance Appraisals. These
ratings are very important in comparing
competing candidates for promotion. Be
sure you do everything within your power
to achieve the best ratings you can. Also
verify that your ratings are correctly re-
corded in the data base. If you weTe rated
in the top six percent, be sure that is co-
rectly recorded. On the other hand, if you
find yourself in a situation where you can-
not earn high ratings no matter how hard you
try, consider transferring to a new organi-
zation, job or career field.
• Personnel Summary. If these are re-
quired for your grade, be suTe yours is ac-
curate and current. YOU must prepare your
Personnel Summary and keep it up to date,
making sure it reflects your current job
achievements, awards, education, overseas
assignments, and so forth. (For an excel-
lent guide, read I l article, P.L. 86-36
'"Some Tips on Getting Promoted," in the
December, 1978 CRYPTOLOG. Virginia's ar-
ticle has had a positive effect upon Per-
sonnel Summaries, but it is unbelieveable
how many senior people still neglect this
important matter.)
Third and finally, you should consider
the following list of general suggestions:
• Your education. If you've received
a certificate or degree of any kind since
you entered on duty, you must complete the
Employee Education Record, Form 4694, and
forward it through channels to get that inn-
port ant achievement entered in youT re-
cords. This does not happen automatically.
If you've taken courses but have not received
your degree, be sure these are recorded.
• Your COSC and suffix. If you are a
supervisor, be sure the suffix is "S".
• Your certifications. Also be sure
that you have the required combination of
certifications and job title for your next
promotion. If in doubt, check it out with
your supervisor or personnel representative.
You should continue professional and self-
improvement activities, such as education
and training, so that you will keep your
mind active, grow in ability and stature,
and improve your chances of being given
increased responsibilities and promotions.
•Be conscientious and provide respon-
sible and timely service to everyone you
support .
• Continually search for and identify
ways to improve individual and aggregate
effectiveness.
•Be realistic and think positively;
don't spend a lot of energy finding fault
or specifying reasons why something can't
be done. Rather, find ways to excel in
spite of obstacles.
• Do thorough and complete work. Don't
pass ha If- finished answers to your boss and
others and expect them to do the work for
you.
•Always try to do professional, high-
quality work.
• Take the initiative in doing things
which must be done; don't wait for someone
to get you started.
Jan-Mar 81 * CRYPTOLOG * Page 10
UNCLASSIFIED
DOCID : 40TSBS7
UNCLASSIFIED
■* Keep your boss posted on things you
think he should be aware of. He should re-
ciprocate.
■•Support your boss in solving the or-
ganization's problems.
■■Meet deadlines and let people know if
there are obstacles which may prevent that.
• Create a good image for yourself and
your organization.
■Be a good team member, involving others,
training and helping them, recognizing and
using their strengths and tolerating or
helping eliminate their weaknesses.
• Be sensitive to the needs and limita-
tions of your audience. Know when it is nec-
essary to summarize or simplify things so
that busy people can look, comprehend, and know
what we want them to do, so that they can act
quickly.
■Be a company-person while you are at
work; put the organization's goals ahead of
your personal goals.
• When you have questions or problems, or
you aren't sure what's expected, discuss these
concerns with your boss.
• And, very important, as a first order of
buisiness on any new job, train your* own re-
placement. Not only does this insure the pre-
sence of someone who can back up your work in
your absence, but it also leaves you free to
accept a new assignment — possibly, a step up —
with minimum inconvenience to the organization.
You may wish to add items which are im-
portant in your particular situation, but
which have not been included here.
I am tempted to close with, "Good luck!"
But I am confident that you won't need much
luck to get promoted if you make a serious
effort to follow these suggestion. Moreover,
these ideas should help you to continue to
earn your true economic worth quicker than
most.
S'f/m ffebteb
The following foreign-language films are scheduled
for showing to interested Agency personnel. These
presentations, which are jointly sponsored by the
Crypto-Linguistic Association and the National Cryp-
tologic School, are shown in the Friedman Auditorium
at 0930 hours on the days indicated. The films are
unclassified.
Thursday, 14 May "Wozzeck" (German)
Thursday, 25 June "Border Street" (Polish)
All personnel are invited to attend.
Jan-Mar 81 * CRYPTOLOG * Page 11
UNCLASSIFIED
DOCID: 4019687
UNCLASSIFIED
by D. H. W.
This puzzle uses cryptic definitions:
puns, anagrams, constructions, etc.
If you are not familiar with this
form, call CRYPTOLOG on 1103s, and
you will be sent a rundown on defini-
tions of this type. Good luck!
A. Put away the swords, Heather said
B. Ornithogalum thyrsoldes (2 wds)
209 219 86 62 189 191 215
C. Surrey town located above U.S. Marine
D. Twins age fast at new museum (2 wds)
E. "And so he mediates, twice near
The tides that wash on old Algier"
(2 wds)
F. Head of Metro and DDE visit Douglas
G. Get Helen Kennedy.
H. : "Does it hurt?" " I laugh." (2 wds)
I. Hilaire Belloc hero usually has
yellowish hue
J. Twenty-four hours ago he was a
steady rye drinker
K. Wrapped in the wads of bandage
92 76 113 146 155 79 163 88 119 132 24
143 250 ”54 ~ 106 “12 176 239
142 ”33 158 130 240 228 145 248 ”29 ~9~ ISO
“84 178 202 169 ”95 127 TOO ”56
In ”94 105 247 123 152 l3l 173 148 201
226 “23 237
230 154 227 253
184 135 ”89 Il2 235
164 ~6~ ”91 ”63 186 223 l07 128
”26 ”97 ~T" 224 ”68 ”65 182
232 ~TT 238 210 137 ~1~ 25” 24l “73
222 214 225 190 136 ITT 149
60 199
52 245
L. Not on hand
M. It's the wonderful lather we feel
leads to such a state of perfection
(comp)
N. "Bonnie " (2 wds)
O. Wearily I left to see my solicitor
P. Disregard
Q. Double checker of a tergiversation
R. Restive; not asleep (var.)
37 109 144 67 87 117 213
”20 15l ”66 l2l 140 ”98 203 236 194 254 217 138
133 ”30 ”22 ~U U8 167 25l ”6l 208 177 160 ~TS "~8T
104 ^9 ”47 166 ”3 34
”69 179 170 200 206 168
159 147 114 ”45 ”42 162 "To I4T ~96 “78 244 ”53 2ll
”l5
188 "T" 23l 183 ”50 ”27 "To ”57
Jan-Mar 81 * CRYPT0L0G * Page 12
UNCLASSIFIED
DOCID: 4019687
UNCLASSIFIED
S. Worse than a vile sea monster
T. Indian town for two idiots
U. Large ice sheet in Antarctica (var.)
(2 wds)
V. To make the stout weed tender,
he boiled it longer than anyone else
W. I betrayed him when I saw him swipe
a Cheddar cheese
X. Smelly seat in church?
Y. Remark directed at Dr. I.Q. (8 wds)
Z. The salamander went home
Develop a large state in the mind
212 71 80 41 116 153 83 110 55
229 156 ~TZ ~~ 46 125 ~85
49 ~ 129~ 122 103~ ~ll 187~ 243 216 40
“64 “58 174 204 218 191 ~l2 ”48 101
134 192 “99 124 205 195 ~l8
150 “39 “35 207
233 “28 102 242 “43 181 172 “90 185 16l 139 ~59 “82
252 220 “36 “16 157 198 246 “93 193 T" l08 U5
126 165 196
22l 120 ”74 “38
R [21 130
15
i
■ 16 Y
17
N
18
W
27"
E
■28 Y
29
C
30
IF
U 6 H
■■t9~0~
11 51 134 13 44 175 249
TT1 [9 C 1 10 R
21 I 22 N T3HT
3T1 - ■■
p
*1 S “
42 Q
43 Y
44 Z x
45 Q
46 T
P
47 0
5^E
5Tq~
54 B
55 S
56 D
57 R
58 V
59 Y
60 B
61 N
65^"
66 M
p
67 L
68 I
70 Q
71 S
72 T
73 J
7Tq~
79 B
80 S
81 N
|
82 Y
83 S
84 D
85 T
■
p
91 H
92 B
93 Y
94 E
95 D
96 Q
97 I
98 M
Hi
■ p
104 (T
1U5T
r06~TT
TT57T
[108 Y
109 L
110 s
117 T
1
118 N
119 B
120 Z
121 M
122 U
123 E
124 W
■
129 U
mrr
132 B
133 N
134 Z x
■
135 G
136 K
137 J
143 B~
144 L
1
145 C
146 B
147 Q
148 E
149 K
150 X
156 T
157 Y
159 Q
160 N
161 Y
P
162 Q
163 B
^TT
165 Y
170 P
171 K
■
172 Y
173 E
174 V
p”*l
176 B
177 N
178 D
183 R
184 G
186 H
187 U
188 R
189 A
|
[190 K -
191 A
196 Y
197 V
198 Y
199 B
200 P
201 E
202 D
20^?
I
204 V
209 A
P
210 J
211 Q
212 S
213 L
P
214 K
215 A
216 U
217 M 1
■
Ti l k
223 TT
224 r
P
225 F
227 F
228 0
229 T-l
M
■
234 W
235 G
236 M
238 J
239 B
240 C
241 J
247 E
248 C
249 Z 1
250 B
■
251 N
252 Y
254 M
Ll z 1 12 B
*4 6 25 1
}6 Y 37 L
\9 U 50 R
52 A 63 H
74 Z 75 N
37 L 88 B
LOO D 101 V
L12 G 113 B
L26 Y ■
[38""M~
1.52 E 153 S
L67 N 168 P
L3 D.4 1
H26 X
3^ :
R 02y
155
p7 D 1281
140 M 14IQ
154 F 1551
207 X
208 N
21^A
120 Y
221 Z]
232 J
P
233 Y
244 Q
245 E
246 Y
I.t
Jan-Mar 81 * CRYPT0L0G * Page 13
UNCLASSIFIED
DOCID: 4019687
UNCLASSIFIED
THflraSJ.flTQ'B JN VtJlIR POCKET
PIE.
P.L. 86-36
N ow that personal computers are a
household item and hand-held cal-
culators are being held by almost
every hand, it has become inevitable
that hend-held language "translators' 1
should be vying for their share of the
market. They claim to ease the problems
of travel in foreign lands. But what can
these electronic translators actually do,
and are they worth the investment?
First let's note that the word
"translator 11 is used rather loosely.
The device won't replace a human being
skilled in the languages of interest.
For most purposes, it won't even replace
a pocket dictionary. But it may be a
useful tool for vocabulary drill, pro-
nunciation, grammatical review, conversion,
or checking the waiter's addition. (They
also function as conventional arithmetic
calculators. )
The general format is a hand-held,
battery-powered, microprocessor-driven
device into which one or more programmed
modules may be inserted. A keyboard per-
mits the entry of alphabetic and numeric
characters, as well as a few special char-
acters. A small selection of modules
(usually containing one language or one
language pair per module) is available with
the introduction of the device; additional
modules are introduced later, as they be-
come available. Several modes of entry are
possible:
•words may be spelled out, one letter
at a time, and entered into temporary
memory, to build a phrase or sentence
•high-frequency phrases or partial phrases
may be keyed in
•sequences of words may be searched, to
find a specific word, or as a vocabulary
drill
Built-in phrases have the advantage of
being grammatically correct, but, of course,
their number is limited. The number of dis-
tinct words, although larger than the number
of phrases, is also quite restricted, espe-
cially as compared to a pocket dictionary.
Furthermore, the meaning selection is re-
stricted to a single word, and no attempt
is made to achieve grammatical correctness
as the words are used in a stream. This
can best be illustrated by discussing the
individual translator models.
There are three currently on the market —
the Lexicon LK-3000 by Nixdorf, the Craig Ml 00,
and the Texas Instruments Language Translator.
Sharp Co. has a model (with about five times
the word capacity of the others) which may be
introduced in the United States in the near
future .
The Lexicon was the first on the market
and is currently the one with the widest array
of language modules. The keyboard contains
26 letters, a space key, and an "upper case"
capdfcility for ten digits, eight special char-
acters, and nine special-purpose keys. There
are six function keys:
•a function key [f], used predominantly
with modules other than language modules
•a clear key [clr] , used to halt one pro-
cess and begin another
•a backspace key [bs] , used to delete char-
acters one at a time (when entering a
word) or to reverse the direction of
translation (after pressing the clear
key)
•an "open dictionary" key [?], used to
search alphabetically through the words
in the dictionary
•a step key [stp], used to enter the words
of a phrase into temporary memory (before
a word is admitted to temporary memory,
the dipt ionary is searched; if the word
is not in the dictionary, the user may
try to substitute a word that ie in the
dictionary). '’This key is also used in
conjunction with the "open dictionary"
key to step through the dictionary one
word at a time. For example, to find
the English words and phrases beginning
with "I", press "I", then [?], then
[stp]. The phrases "I am", "I am hun-
gry:, "I am in a hurry", and so forth,
will appear in sequence with each suc-
Jan-Mar 81 * CRYPTOLOG * Page 14
UNCLASSIFIED
DOCID
4019687
UNCLASSIFIED
cessive press of [stp] . To obtain the
translation of one of these phrases,
press [?].
•the definition key [def], used when the
word, phrase or sentence is complete,
to give the original and its trans-
lation.
A few idiosyncrasies can be illustrated
with the English-Portuguese module. Suppose
the following words are entered into the
temporary memory by pressing the [stp] key
following each word, which causes each word
to be looked up individually:
YES [stp] I [stp] WANT [stp] DINNER [def]
The translator will deliver:
YES I WANT DINNER = SIM EU QUERER JANTAR.
progressively across its screen. But if the
words "I WANT 1 ' are entered as a phrase:
YES [stp] I WANT [stp] DINNER [def]
the result is more grammatical :
YES I WANT DINNER = SIM EU QUERO JANTAR.
The practiced user will learn the phrases
which are available, in order to take ad-
vantage of this feature.
Sometimes words are available only in
Portuguese. For example, when entering the
phrase QUE HORAS SAG one word at a time, the
user discovers that HORAS and SAO are not
in the dictionary. But when entering it as
a phrase, that is, without a [stp] after each
word, the user reads
QUE HORAS SAO = WHAT TIME IS IT.
Its limited vocabulary will be one of
the biggest frustrations for the user. There
are about a thousand vocabulary items (each
word and each phrase counting as one item) .
Travelers with children, for example, may
well wonder why "pizza" and "beer" are in-
cluded, but "milk" is not.
A cursory grammatical summary attempts
to acquaint the user with the vagaries of
the foreign language, it’s probably better
than nothing at all, but that's about the
most that can be said for it.
The Lexicon's memory is arranged in
English word order. Stepping through vocab-
ulary words that begin with the same letter
or letters is very prompt when in the English
mode. In the foreign- language mode, however,
there are frequent pauses, during which the
device advises "SEARCHING."
Bilingual modules currently available are
between English and Spanish, French, Italian,
German, Polish, Portuguese and Greek, with
Swedish, Russian and Japanese in preparation.
Also available is a "Person to Person" module,
which, according to the manufacturer, "con-
tains fun, social vocabulary in six languages.
Introduce yourself, suggest a game of tennis,
make a dinner date... in any combination of
English, Spanish, French, German, Italian or
phonetic Greek."
There is also a calculator module which
"turns the LK-3000 into a sophisticated five-
function calculator with memory, memory-plus
and memory-recall functions. For the benefit
of world travelers, this module also provides
conversions for metric units and for foreign
currencies.
Finally, the Lexicon can provide a filing
system module and a personal program module.
The latter permits the user to create his own
small (1000-character) dictionary, and to re-
trieve stored data based on a search key.
The Craig M100 has similar features,
with a few extra bells and whistles. Instead
of bilingual modules, it offers single-
language "capsules," three of which may be
inserted and made accessible at any one time.
Each capsule contains about 1200 words or
phrases. Expanded memory capsules with
over 2000 words apiece, including verb con-
jugations and case endings, are now being
introduced. The keyboard allows for 26 letters
a space, ten digits, and ten special characters
The bottom cover of the Ml 00 has two
lists — one of complete phrases and one of
partial phrases, each identified by a
single letter. When the PHR key is pressed
once, followed by the appropriate letter,
one of the complete phrases will be dis-
played. Depress ing PHR twice, followed
by one of the letters yields the corre-
sponding partial phrase. The phrase will
then be displayed in the language of inter-
est by pressing one of the language select-
ion keys.
Words may be entered one letter at a
time, and may be used in conjunction with
the phrase and partial phrase inventories.
The capability to select from various mean-
ings of a word is included. For example,
WATCH (CLOCK) and WATCH (SEE) are both
possible. The user chooses the one de-
sired. In order to determine what the
choices are, the user presses the SCH
key after spelling the word WATCH. The
same procedure can be used to find the cor-
rect spelling of a word. Words are held
in memory until the user presses the
Language Selection Key desired.
In addition to the capability to
search the memory alphabetically, it is
also possible to search it categorically,
using the [LRN] key. For example, the
sequence
Jan-Mar 81 * CRYPTOLOG * Page 15
UNCLASSIFIED
DOCID: 4019687
CO NFIDENTIAL
[CLR] FAMILY [LRN]
the screen, or speed of search and learn
functions)
will yield
FAMILY
PARENTS
FATHER
MOTHER
HUSBAND
(U) Even with no capsule in place, the M100
can perform simple calculations and basic
metric conversions. And fourteen common ex-
pressions can be evoked in four languages —
English, French, Spanish and German.
(U) Capsules are currently available for
English, French, German, Spanish, Italian
and Japanese. There is a Phonetic Pronun-
ciation Capsule, with which ,r the user can
now pronounce words in any translated lan-
guage.” Other capsules in the works are
Bar and Wine, Nutritional, Calorie Counter,
Spelling, and various word games.
• a rotate key [ROT] , which causes the dis-
play to move across the screen
•a search key [SCH], which starts or stops
an alphabetical search of the file
•a hold key [HLD] , which allows the user
to enter a word on the screen even if it
is not in memory. This is used for proper
names and cognate words.
CU) In addition there are three keys which
are used to select among the three capsules,
and another to select the built-in information.
(U) Texas Instruments has recently intro-
duced its "Language Translator," which ap-
parently has similar capabilities to those
of the other two, but with one added capa-
bility: it will pronounce the words or
phrases for you. It is currently avail-
able with English, French, German, and
Spanish modules.
(U) The Ml 00 has the following ten function
keys:
• a clear key [CLR], which clears the
entire entry when the device is in
translate mode; when in calculator mode,
it clears the entry and returns to trans-
late mode.
•a clear entry key [C/E], which clears the
entry in calculator mode, but acts as a
backspace/delete key In the translate mode
•a shift key [SHFT], which must be used
before each keystroke when a digit or
special character is desired
•an external program key [EXT[, which
selects the calculator program, which is
built in, or a special purpose program
•a phTase key [PHR], which starts or stops
a vocabulary review by word category, such
as car, train, hotel, sick, and so forth
• a fast/slow key [F/S], which is used to
select the relative speed of automatic
functions (speed of motion of text across
CU) The translators list for between
$120 (Lexicon) and $300 Texas Instruments),
but discounts are available . Extra mod-
ules are $25 for the Craig and $60 for the
other two .
(O') The question remains— are they worth
the money? Probably not, if you expect to
forego the standard ways of getting around
in a foreigji country, such as dictionaries,
language courses, and the like. But if
you're gadget-Tiftppy, if you like the idea
of being the focus of attention while the
natives "ooh" and "ah" over your elec-
tronic translator, if you want to own an
expensive calculator that does more than
just calculate, or if you have an eye on
some of the special-purpose modules now
being developed, then perhaps you will
decide to get a translator of your very
own.
(U) And if you can’t decide, perhaps you
would like to try the Craig or the Lexi-
con which PI has available for loan. If
so, call the author on 1103s.
- (G CC0) ~ POSTSCRIPT: With regard to potential— applications within p.L. 86-36
the Agency foT electronic translators, r of f fers " the following
observations: Although there might not be a groundswell of interest in
language translators qua language translators, the ability to enter one's
own data into them makes them very interesting indeed. If they con-
tained a small code book, they could be used for quick look-up of terms,
pr maybe callsigns, or abbreviations, or you-name-it. R17 is currently
in the process of modifying one of these translators to perform various
COMSEC and other user- defined functions. This research may open broad
new vistas for analytic, COMSEC or training potential. Watch for more
information about experimentation, and don't hesitate to call with any
ideas you have that you might want to try.
Jan-Mar 81 * CRYPTOLOG * Page 16
CONFIDENTIAL
■ HANDLE VIA OQ MINT O11ANNDL0 ONLY
DOCID: 4019687
UNCLASSIFIED
I
I
r
n We trained hard but it
seened that every time we were
beginning to form up into teans
we would be reorganized, I was
to learn later in life that we
tend to meet any new situation
by reorganizing; and ar wonderful
method it can be for creating
the illusion of progress "
Petronius Arbiter, 210 B,C.
Jan-Mar 81 * CRYPTOLOG * Page 17
UNCLASSIFIED
DOCID: 4019687
UNCLASSIFIED
NCS-CLA Symposium
The National Cryptologic School and the Crypto-Linguistic
Association are co-sponsoring a Language Training Symposium in
May and June of this year. At the opening session on 5 May,
following intorductory remarks by Lieutenant General Lincoln
D. Faurer, Director, NSA, the keynote address will be given
by Mrs. Minnie Kenny, Deputy Assistant Director for Training.
The symposium will present a broad spectrum of language
training programs and perspectives, featuring speakers not
only from NSA and the Service Cryptologic Elements, but also
from the Defense Language Institute, the Foreign Service In-
stitute, CIA. the Marvland State Department of Education, the
Montgomery County (MD) Public Schools, and the Congress of the
United States. Appropriately, the final session on 12 June
will focus on the methodology and techniques of evaluation
of language training.
T he Special Group for Lingui stics (SIGLING) ? whose chair-
man is I 1 has invited a distinguished
group of outside speakers for the symposium, which will be
the first of its kind ever held at the Agency. All sessions
will be held in the Friedman Auditorium. Those in May will be
open to everyone; those in June will be for fully cleared per-
sonnel only.
The schedule is as follows:
Tuesday, 5 May, 1300-1500
Wednesday, 6 May, 1300-1500
Wednesday, 13 May, 0900-1100
Thursday, 14 May, 0900-1100
TXiesday, 19 May, 1300-1500
%
Thursday, 21 May, 1300-1500
Welcome — | ~| President. CLA
Introductory Remarks — Lt Gen Lincoln D.
Faurer, USAF, Director, National Security
Agency
Keynote Address— Mrs. Minnie Kenny, Deputy
Assistant Director for Training, N$A
The Russian Linguist Acquisition Program
and the Romanian Instruction Prbgram—
| |P16, NSA
A Congressional Perspective 6n the Lan-
guage Problem— Hon. C. W. "Bill" Young
^FloridA)
CIA Language Traini ng Programs and Oral
Interview Testine—
i
r
FSI Language Training Program and Novel
Approaches to Language Learning— Dr.
Earl Stevick, Foreign Service Institute,
Department of State
Two Perspectives on Language Training:
Academia — Mrs. Marie S. Rentz, Univer-
sity of Maryland
Maryland State Public Education — Miss
Ann Beusch
P. L.
86-36
Jan-Mar 81 * CRYPTOLOG * Page 18
UNCLASSIFIED
DOCID
4019687
UNCLASSIFIED
Tuesday, 26 May, 0900-1100 Defense Language Institute Training
Program— Lt Col Roland W. Fleming, Jr.
Thursday, 28 May, 0900-1100
Thursday, 11 June, 0900-1100
1300-1500
Friday, 12 June, 0900-1000
1000-1100
Total Immersion Language Study
Spanish — Miss Louise Rosenberg, Rock
Creek Forest Elementary School, Chevy
Chase, MD
French— Dr. Gabriel Jacobs, Four Comers
Elementary School, Silver Spring, MD
Language Training: A, B and G Group
Perspectives — Speakers to be announced
later
Language Training: The Service Crypto-
logic Element Perspectives — Speakers
to be announced later
National Cryptologic School Language
Training — Speakers to be announced
later
Language Training Evaluation — Speakers
to be announced later
Why Do They Leave?
■- P.L.
E7
standpoints — the seriousness of the loss
and the reasons for the loss.
In recent years the language career
field has commanded a great deal of atten-
tion by Agency managers and planners; a
great deal of folk wisdom has been gener-
ated to describe the various aspects of
what is generally referred to as "the lan-
guage problem." The folk wisdom holds that
linguists are fleeing the language career
field at alarming rates for employment in
toher career fields within the Agency, and
that this exodus occurs about the time the
linguist reaches Grade 11 or 12, that is,
the professional level.
A recent survey of 63 linguists who have
abandoned their language careers for other
jobs within the Agency has provided some use-
ful information on their views of language
work in the Agency, and also provides man-
agement with a more complete picture of the
segment of the linguist population that is
being lost.
The survey findings, augmented by work
force data supplied by M331, show that the
exodus from the language career field may
be more imaginary than real when compared to
other career fields, but nevertheless they
do cast new light on the problem from two
The seriousness of the loss, of course,
lies in the fact that the vast majority of
the linguists who do leave are the experi-
enced ones, the cadre, so to speak. They
are not easily replaced, and the loss of
their expertise is felt in at least two
vital areas: the quality of the product
issued, and guidance to junior linguists.
The survey found that the linguist departing
the field has an average grade of GG10.4, with
five or more years experience, and that a full
48 percent has achieved the professional
level, that is, has passed the Professional
Qualification Examination, in one or more
languages.
Nearly one -ha If of the linguists leaving
the career field identified the lack of up-
ward mobility within the field as the pri-
mary reason for leaving. Even where this
is not the primary reason, it is the sec-
ondary reason for another 19 percent. This
would indicate that job dissatisfaction is
not a major factor in their decision. This
view is reinforced by the statistic that
86-36
Jan-Mar 81 * CRYPTOLOG * Page 19
* * 4
UNCLASSIFIED
DOCID: 4019687
SECRET
41 percent of the linguists responding to
the survey stated that they would be will-
ing to return to language work if the career
advancement opportunities were improved,
while another 11 percent were undecided.
It is conceivable that if the conditions the
linguists viewed as unsatisfactory were im-
proved, fully one-half of those currently de-
parting the field would remain as productive,
experienced workers. This view is further
borne out by the responses of the linguists
when asked how much longer they would have
remained in the field if the conditions
they viewed as untenable had been different.
Thirty-eight percent said they would have
stayed two or more years (the longest
option offered on the survey form. Only
13 percent reported that they would have
left about the same time regardless of
conditions. Another 40 percent were unde-
cided. This should be contrasted to the
number of linguists who said that, under
current conditions within the language
field, they felt that they had made a wise
choice in leaving. Four-fifths of those
responding said they felt they had made a
wise choice, and only one linguist felt
that the decision was unwise. The remain-
ing respondents were ambivalent.
(U) The folk wisdom view that attrition
among linguists is greater at Grades 11
and 12 is substantiated by the survey,
which goes on to indicate that the prob-
lem begins even earlier than Grade 11. It
appears from, the data gathered through the
questionnaire that the problem begins in
earnest around Grade 9 and remains con-
stant throughout Grades 9, 11, 12 and 13.
The linguists in these grades noted "lack
of advancement," "no promotions," and
"dead-end field" as primary reasons for
their leaving. Linguists in the lower
grades were more apt to mention working
conditions, job dissatisfaction, academic
or professionalization problems, and
lessening enthusiasm for language work
as primary reasons for leaving. Never-
theless, lack of promotions remains a
concern even for linguists at Grade 7.
(U) If any picture emerges from the fore-
going, it is one of frustrated employees.
On one hand, the linguists enjoy the work
and would like to continue in the field
as a career. On the other hand, just when
the linguists have been in the field long
enough to have had the training and gain
the experience that enables them to do the
work in a professional mannaer and to
pass their knowledge on to newer lin-
guists, they feel pressures forcing them
out of the field if they are to continue
to move upward in the organization.
Whether the pressures are real or imagi-
nary, and whether the linguists 1 posi-
tions in the organization are improved
or not by their actions (nearly 80 per-
cent feel theiT position is improved) ,
the result is the same: the linguists*
expertise is lost to the Agency. And this
loss is a costly one. Years of training
time and thousands of training dollars
have been wasted, and the replacement
linguists will require the same invest-
ment of time and money.
(U) The "language problem" is less a
language problem than it is a management
problem. Until a language career field
is developed that offers, or appears to
offer, equal advantages with the other
career fields, the Agency will have to
suffer the loss of experienced linguists
and recruit and train replacements for
those who seek greener pastures else-
where. The management question, which
begs for an answer is
Which is more costly: paying the exper-
ienced linguist to perform y or contin-
ually training newer — and less experi-
enced — linguists to replace them when
they look ahead and see no future in
their career field?
The latter option is an illusory one. The
recently trained linguist is a replacement
only in quantitative terms. The loss of
an experienced linguist represents a geo-
metric loss, not an arithmetic one. Lin-
guists are not interchangeable. Experience
is a vital attribute that should not be
treated capriciously.
EO 1.4. (c)
EO 1.4. (d)
P.L. 86-36
**************************
(Continued from Page 9)
Jan-Mar 81 * CRYPTOLOG * Page 20
Pl-May 81-S3-3930
S ECRET
IIAMDLB VIA OOMPJT OIIAMNDLO ONLY
Live Music
Archive
Librivox
Free Audio
Metropolitan Museum
Cleveland
Museum of Art
Internet
Arcade
Console Living Room
Open Library
American
Libraries
TV News
Understanding
9/11